Saturday, June 21, 2008

Taxpayers United for Fairness Press Release
November 21, 2005

Shown below is the TUFF Press Release as was received in December, 2005.





Affidavit of Janet C. Campbell for Diana Vice in Tremco vs. Diana Vice
March, 2008




New Hampshire Privacy Code - Paragraph V

Much like other states, the New Hampshire Privacy Code states that public and private entities in the course and scope of employment and supported by articulable suspicion, are not limited from the "attempt to capture any type of visual image, sound recording or other physical impression of a person during an investigation, surveillance, or monitoring of conduct to obtain evidence of suspected illegal activity...or any other suspected fraudulent conduct or activity involving a violation of law, or pattern of business activities adversely affecting the public health or safety."

Despite that code, Gerard Beloin in New Hampshire was civilly sued, prosecuted criminally and is now jailed for taping those threatening him.


Also, the New Hampshire Criminal Code allows for the use of non-deadly force if they or their property is in danger. See the following:
627:1, 627:4(I), 627:7, 627:8 of TITLE LXII CRIMINAL CODE CHAPTER 627

JUSTIFICATION
627:1 General Rule. – Conduct which is justifiable under this chapter constitutes a defense to
any offense. The fact that such conduct is justifiable shall constitute a complete defense to any
civil action based on such conduct.

627:4 (I) Physical Force in Defense of a Person. – A person is justified in using non-deadly force upon another person in order to defend himself or a third person from what he reasonably believes to be the imminent use of unlawful, non-deadly force by such other person, and he may use a degree of such force which he reasonably believes to be necessary for such purpose.

627:7 Use of Force in Defense of Premises. – A person in possession or control of premises or a person who is licensed or privileged to be thereon is justified in using non-deadly force upon
another when and to the extent that he reasonably believes it necessary to prevent or terminate the commission of a criminal trespass by such other in or upon such premises, but he may use deadly force under such circumstances only in defense of a person as prescribed in RSA 627:4 or when he reasonably believes it necessary to prevent an attempt by the trespasser to commit
arson.

627:8 Use of Force in Property Offenses. – A person is justified in using force upon another when and to the extent that he reasonably believes it necessary to prevent what is or reasonably appears to be an unlawful taking of his property, or criminal mischief, or to retake his property immediately following its taking; but he may use deadly force under such circumstances only in defense of a person as prescribed in RSA 627:4.